View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
Voted for Jamie. Everyone get onto it.
https://www.afl.com.au/mark-of-the-year _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
done!! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
It was forgone conclusion, but Elliott's mark officially won a nomination for Mark of the Year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_2zUEe43PU _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
There was Geelong people who actually thought Guthries mark was better. Go ahead and support your team and all, but sheesh. _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: Re: Vote for Mark of the Year -- WHE | |
|
Presti35 wrote: | And there are actually Geelong people who think Guthrie took the better mark. |
Had this conversation today. I am in shock that ppl are so biased towards their team, that they think a good mark is better than the best mark taken in 5 years. Purely based on the players jumper.
It was more meaningful in the game and a classic mark they teach kids in school.
At least there were non-Collingwood people on my side. But yes, the Krakouer-Walker and Howe-Daniher marks were debated too. _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
|